Category Archives: Employment

More examples of what not to do AKA how to stay in the frying pan and not fall into the fire.

This is the second article in the series about what not to do.  The person suggesting this article asked for examples of things that might help you save yourself from yourself.  Please send me your examples and stories of things not to do.  Your confidentiality will be protected unless you want credit for the idea.  Sharing this experience, especially with younger executives is one of the best ways to serve the industry.  I have an outline of a third article and depending upon response, I could probably keep this going for a while since like a consultant friend of mine used to say, “One idiot can keep three consultants busy forever.”

Project planning

Ben Franklin’s adage goes, “Failing to plan is planning to fail.”  I have found this profound simple statement to be true time and again.

After being appointed interim CFO in a hospital, I learned that there was a major construction project under way.  The project and the rate at which the hospital was burning money on the project did not make sense to me.  To make a long, complicated story short, no one could produce a feasibility study to support the project’s value proposition or pro-forma analysis to support the project’s underlying  financing.  When no one could produce a sources and uses of funds analysis, I spent a couple of weeks creating my own from scratch.  When I was finished, it was clear that the project was underfunded by over $20 million and the hospital did not have sufficient reserves to cover the shortfall.  When this information was provided to the Board, after they recovered from the shock and horror, they decided to stop the project that would have resulted in a problem with the bonds used to finance the project by drawing reserves below bond covenant minimum requirements triggering a technical default.  The entire organization was oblivious to this looming disaster.

Ole Abe said that, “You should spend twice as much time sharpening your axe as you spend cutting with it.”  The implication of this admonition is obvious to anyone that has ever cut wood with an axe.  Still and yet, executives let distractions and competition for their time lead them to allow ill-conceived initiatives to go forward then they are surprised when the projects blow up on them.  If you want to entertain yourself, pick any executive out at a cocktail party and ask them if they have ever seen a project go bad.  The war stories you will hear are spectacular. Better yet, ask the ‘expert’ if they have ever seen a peer do something stupid.  Apparently, they have not heard or have disregarded the advice of Einstein, “Doing the same thing and expecting a different outcome is the beginning of insanity.”

Project control

Oh boy!  The easy part of a project is the planing and approval.  The hard part is execution.  There are a lot of challenges with project execution.  One is that other unanticipated confounding priorities arise in the organization that bleed capacity from the organization’s leadership to remain focused on a critical project.  Another commonly seen problem with project execution is the loss of key leaders during the course of the project.  All too frequently, critical assumptions underlying the project’s rationalization are proven inaccurate or incomplete once execution begins.  Sometimes, a project’s success is largely dependent upon one person and if that person leaves or is incapacitated, the entire project goes into jeopardy.

To some degree, a project is analogous to a marriage.  In order for it to succeed, more than 100% commitment is required from all sides.  Every effort you make to manage your risk can be thwarted by uncontrollable changes in your business partner(s).  There is no guarantee that the people that sold a deal and made commitments on behalf of your business partner will be around to honor those commitments.  If they made commitments that were not in the contract, they may not be allowed to honor them.  More than once before a project was completed, I have found myself dealing with an entirely different cast of characters.  What about a business partner that gets acquired during implementation and none of the commitments made before the acquisition are honored?  A business failure or overcommitment by a business partner can move into your life like bad in-laws.  This is why business partner selection is so important.  Too often, a decision maker will chose a business partner based on cost alone and in the process buy himself a set of problems that turn out to be exponentially more expensive than the most expensive option that was under consideration at the time the decision was made.

A project does not have to fail to become a disaster.  Delays in a project can be as damaging.  I do not know of a delayed project that resulted in a better outcome.  Sometimes, delays cause cascading problems.  Take a construction project for example where the electrical contractor is contracted to start on a date certain and the project is not far along enough for them to begin work.  This kind of a delay can rapidly spread throughout an organization and create enough problems to overwhelm the ability of the leadership team to address them.  This is the reason you were required to study PERT in school.  How often do you see it applied in practice?

If a mistake is to be made in project management, it should be biased in favor of overcompensation for potential problems.  I am regularly criticized for being too conservative and too hard on pro-forma analysis assumptions. Never the less, time after time I see projected revenues and time lines being overstated and projected expenses understated.

Waiting too long to intervene

I have watched executives demur from engaging an issue in hopes that it would go away.  I have rarely seen this strategy work.  More often than not, a problem in an organization will get worse the longer intervention is delayed.  There are a lot of reasons that this occurs not the least of which is that addressing operational problems most often involves dealing with a personnel problem.  I do not know many executives that enjoy taking on a personnel problem.  Vince Lombardi said, “Hope is not a strategy.”  Failing or refusing to intervene can allow a problem to become exponentially more damaging until it reaches the point that the organization’s financial statements are impacted.  Time and again as an interim, I have been asked, why it was going to take so long and cost so much to address a problem?  I have seen ten or more interim executives committed to address what had been allowed to become a major business problem on more than one occasion.  My answer to this question is always the same.  Cutting costs after an organization finally decides to address a problem only prolongs the time and cost necessary for the mitigation.  All too frequently, organizations create a problem by under-resourcing an area or initiative.  When this leads to a melt-down, the leaders charged with the mitigation are frequently frustrated by the cost and time associated with fixing the resulting mess.  Sometimes, I have to tell them for their future reference that the cost associated with keeping a process or function under control is always a small fraction of the time and resources necessary to straighten it out after it goes catawaumpus.  Every executive I know can relate one or more horror stories to prove this point.  More often than not, the fiasco is related to an I/T implementation where the costs and operational consequences associated with a failed project can exceed the original budgeted cost of the project.

Fire fighters are known for over-commiting resources to a fire.  This strategy is designed to err on the side of having more resource than is needed to address the fire as opposed to running the risk that a growing fire will overwhelm the resources that are available on site.  Once, I asked an interim CEO how it was going relatively early into his engagement in a very troubled large hospital.  His answer that I have never forgotten was, “The platform is on fire.”  A platform is like a ship.  When it catches fire, getting off is rarely an option.  You must fight the fire where it is and failure is not an option.  Remember the USS Forestall?  Skimping on resources when dealing with a problem like this can lead to figurative death in the form of an unplanned career transition.  A business problem is analogous to a fire in the organization.  If you are going to make a mistake addressing a problem, your personal risk will be much lower if you respond aggressively to a problem and err on the side of over-commiting resources until the problem is resolved and the situation stabalized.  The alternative is a potential conflagration.

Non-evidence based decisions

The mantra of UAB’s Doctorate of Administration in Health Sciences program is, “Evidence based practice in Healthcare Administration.”  I have commented before on what appears to be a paradox in healthcare.  On the clinical side, most of what is done is based on evidence gained from objective, peer reviewed research.  The purpose of the research is to yield better outcomes and safer facilities for patient care.  In the administrative suites of too many healthcare organizations, decisions are routinely made based on seat-of-the-pants hunches, historical precedent, little or no analysis, ridiculous assumptions, no assumptions, flawed analysis, systematic ignorance or reckless disregard of applicable evidence and research.  More often than not, harried administrators do not even bother to see if any applicable research is available to help them make better decisions.  In other cases, decisions are made for political expediency or to appease Dr. Huff-and-Puff.  I got into trouble in a Catholic hospital for suggesting the leadership team’s decision making ranged from magic eight ball to Ouija board.  I now keep a magic eight ball on my desk as a reminder to not fall into this trap.  It is funny to have younger people ask me what the magic eight ball is.  They’re not old enough in some cases to have ever heard of the magic eight ball and they are fascinated to see how it works.  It is a wonder some organizations get along as well as they do.

Indecisiveness
I was perusing novelty signs in a gift shop in Indiana when a sign captured my attention.  It said, “Decision making around here is like a squirrel crossing the road.”  Indecisiveness can be dangerous when it is practiced in the front office.  At its least, indecisiveness can lead to project and initiave delays.  At worst, it can wreck not only projects but the credibility of executives with their Boards.  There’s a one liner that says, “The road to failure is littered with run over squirrels.”  In an earlier article I said, “If you are a decision maker, make a decision.”  Not making a decision is making a decision.
As before, I would like to thank Dr. Christy Lemak Professor and Chair of the UAB Department of Health Services Administration for the inspiration or should I say assignment that resulted in this article. I am looking forward to seeing my grade.
Please feel free to contact me to discuss any questions or observations you might have about these blogs or interim executive services in general.  As the only practicing Interim Executive that has done a dissertation on Interim Executive Services in healthcare in the US, I might have an idea or two that might be valuable to you.  I can also help with career transitions or career planning.
The easiest way to keep abreast of this blog is to become a follower.  You will be notified of all updates as they occur.  To become a follower, just click the “Following” link that usually appears as a bubble near the bottom this web page.
There is a comment section at the bottom of each blog page.  Please provide input and feedback that will help me to improve the quality of this work.
This is original work.  This material is copyrighted by me with reproduction prohibited without prior permission.  I note and provide links to supporting documentation for non-original material.
If you would like to discuss any of this content or ask questions, I may be reached at ras2@me.com. I look forward to engaging in productive discussion with anyone that is a practicing interim executive or a decision maker with experience engaging interim executives in healthcare.

Examples of what not to do – simple mistakes you have seen that others could avoid.  AKA – How many ways can you get yourself into trouble?

One of the items of constructive feedback I have received is that some of my articles are too long.  The subject of this article resulted in an article over 2,000 words long.  I have reminisced with friends in the consulting business that have suggested that we collaborate on a book on this topic based on the experiences we have had.  As a result, this article will be posted in multiple editions.

A very highly regarded friend of mine recommended that I address mistakes that might be beneficial to others.  Nasreddin said something to the effect that, ‘good judgment comes from the experience we get from exercising bad judgment.’  Given the benefit of this insight, I will address some of the things that I have seen as the cause of extreme angst in one healthcare organization after another.  An exhaustive listing is beyond the scope of any article.  However, I welcome tips and stories from my readers addressing vivid memories of things that would be beneficial for others to know, especially those that do not have the experience of some of us.

Blind trust of systems

This is one of the most basic managerial errors and it is seen over and over.  People ‘assume’ that a system will or will not do something without proving the assumption only to be surprised when their blind faith is proven wrong in a spectacular faux-pas.  Rather than assuming that people understand the meaning of the word ‘assume’, I will define it by dissection.  All to often, people engage in assumptions leading to flawed decisions that make an ASS/out of U/and ME.  I wish I could remember how many times I have witnessed flawed assumptions wreaking havoc around me.  Sometimes, these errors result in terminations of the people involved.  Mark Twain and Ronald Regan said that, “It is not what you know that will get you, it is what you are absolutely certain of that is just not right.”

Once upon a time when I had reason to doubt the controls in the hospital’s accounts payable system right after a new state of the art, super whiz-bang accounting application had been implemented, I was assured by my Controller that there were safeguards in the system that he said would guarantee that there was no scenario under which an automated check for more than $25,000 could be produced and signed with my facsimile.  I had set this limit to insure that I had the chance to personally review large disbursements and sign them manually.  About a week later, it came to my attention that instead of keying a construction draw request of less than $25K, the A/P clerk keyed the remaining balance of over $275K to a contractor that the hospital was engaged in an active dispute with.  What do you think happened when this transaction went through the system without interruption and out to the contractor?  If you ass/u/me that he brought the check back, you would be sorely mistaken.  I am sure others can provide similar nightmare stories.

There are thousands of ways to be trapped by our own systems. The more complex the systems, the greater the number of interfaces with other systems and the higher the volume of transactions, the greater the potential for error and the larger the error will have to become before it is discovered by normal control and balancing processes.

Hiring mistakes

Another HUGE area of learning in the school of hard knocks is hiring decisions.  Jack Welsh said something to the effect of, “Getting the right people into the right jobs is a lot more important than developing a strategy.”  As an interim executive I have observed that one of the more common areas that gets organizations into trouble is hiring decisions that result in people being put into roles where they cannot succeed.  Some organizations and hiring decision makers are highly motivated to put the next person in line into a role whether they are qualified or not.  I have been criticized for bringing people from outside of town into the organization to fill crucial roles.  My response is that if  properly qualified local applicants were available, I would hire locally to save travel money if for no other reason.  I have counseled Boards and written on the subject of organizational performance being nothing more complicated than the collective caliber of the team on the field.  One of my mentors taught me by example the potential and value of getting the right people into the right places in an organization and the difference they can make.

Getting the right people is as important if not more important than avoiding hiring the wrong people by making mistakes in the vetting process.

AR valuation

I have seen so many executives brought down by incorrect valuations of their accounts receivable that I have lost count.  So many in fact, that I was inspired to address one of my blog articles to CEOs that all too often become one of the first victims of this error.  The article asks the question, ‘have you been caught looking?’  One of the biggest risks on a hospital’s financial statements is the valuation of revenue and accounts receivable and for every understatement, there are multiples of over-statements of receivable and revenue value.  In fact, I have not seen an undervaluation recorded although I have been in arguments with outside auditors about under and over valuations of revenue and A/R.  It is a lot easier to convince an audit partner to not book an undervaluation than it is an over valuation.   The executive that wishes to avoid becoming a victim of this trap needs to take the advice of my article on the topic to heart.

AR reclassifications

A reclassification of AR is potentially more dangerous and harder to catch than a simple error in calculating realizable value.  For example, consider an organization that holds self pay balances after insurance in the same bucket as the insurance.  This is considerably more common than many managers appreciate.  Suppose a commercial receivable is valued at 70% of the underlying charges and self pay receivables are valued at 5%.  When an amount like $5 million is reclassified from insurance to self pay to clean up a backlog after the insurance balances have been satisfied, the adjustment to the value of receivables will be 65% (70% – 5%) or $3.25 million.  There are other reasons for balances to accumulate in the wrong buckets on the receivable system leading to reclassification adjustments.  The receivables are not wrong, they are just valued incorrectly.  This kind of error is enough to knock an enormous dent into or potentially wipe out the operating income of any enterprise.  There are rarely adequate cushions or reserves in realizable value calculations to absorb a shock like this.

Summary

As can be seen, a text-book could easily be written on the topic of what not to do.  There are plenty of texts that are written on what to do, they are just all too regularly ignored.  Some leaders seem to not have the ability to connect academic learning and practice. These are but a few examples of things that I have seen go wrong in healthcare organization’s business operations.  This discussion is a good example of the value of experience.  Experienced executives operating on evidence based practice have a far better potential to avoid these pitfalls and others.  Sometimes the value of an executive in an organization is more related to what they know than what they do.  Once a patient in an outage accosted a surgeon  over his fee.  The patient took the position that the fee bore no relationship to the time spent on the procedure.  The surgeon replied that 5% of his fee was for the cutting and the other 95% was for knowing where to cut and what not to cut.

My plan is to publish another article on this topic with more examples of what not to do. If you have any stories to contribute, I would love to hear them.

I would like to thank Dr. Christy Lemak, Dean of the Health Administration program at the University of Alabama at Birmingham for inspiring this article.  I am looking forward to seeing my grade.

Please feel free to contact me to discuss any questions or observations you might have about these blogs or interim executive services in general.  As the only practicing Interim Executive that has done a dissertation on Interim Executive Services in healthcare in the US, I might have an idea or two that might be valuable to you.  I can also help with career transitions or career planning.

The easiest way to keep abreast of this blog is to become a follower.  You will be notified of all updates as they occur.  To become a follower, just click the “Following” link that usually appears as a bubble near the bottom this web page.

There is a comment section at the bottom of each blog page.  Please provide input and feedback that will help me to improve the quality of this work.

This is original work.  This material is copyrighted by me with reproduction prohibited without prior permission.  I note and  provide links to supporting documentation for non-original material.

If you would like to discuss any of this content or ask questions, I may be reached at ras2@me.com. I look forward to engaging in productive discussion with anyone that is a practicing interim executive or a decision maker with experience engaging interim executives in healthcare.

Should I pursue professional credentialing?

I need to start this article with a disclaimer.  I am HIGHLY BIASED in favor of professional credentialing.  If this is offensive to you, stop reading this now.  I am fairly well credentialed.  I have a Masters of Business Administration degree and a Doctorate of Science in Healthcare Administration.  I hold Fellowship certifications from both the Healthcare Financial Management Association (HFMA) and the American College of Healthcare Executives (ACHE).  I hold HFMA certifications in Managed Care and Patient Financial Services (PFS).  I am in the first class to be certified by HFMA in managed care and I was the national co-valedictorian in my HFMA PFS exam class.  I served a sentence on HFMA’s Board of Examiners (BOE) including a year as Chairman of the BOE.  The BOE is responsible for HFMA’s professional certification program.  Other than this, I have not done much to improve myself professionally or promote professional certification.

Lest this come across as self aggrandizing, you should know that I had a rough time in high school but ended up being the first in my family to earn a bachelor’s degree and that undergraduate degree was bestowed by The University of Virginia’s McIntire School of Commerce.  One of the highlights of my service to the healthcare profession is my service on HFMA’s BOE.  A number of changes to the HFMA certification process occurred during my service on the Board and as the Chairman of the BOE that I am very proud of.  Changes that were focused on making the certification process more objective and making the preparation process more efficient.

You’re damn right I think credentialing is important.

More than anything else, I think a professional credential makes a statement about you.  I discuss this in my article about getting ahead.  Holding professional credentials makes a statement  that you have shown willingness to go beyond the minimum required by a job to be recognized by your peers in your discipline as being one of the best among them and an example for others seeking career advancement and improvement.

Professional certifications usually require a combination of education, experience and ability to demonstrate mastery of a discipline.  The effort required to obtain a credential is useful in that in the process of achieving the recognition, it is impossible to not learn something or possibly a lot.  This knowledge is helpful in career development and can differentiate you from your peers in a competitive job or search situation.  Among your peers, those with professional certifications are typically held in higher esteem.

For some credentials and some disciplines, certifications are minimum requirements for certain roles.  There was a time when holding an ACHE Fellowship was practically a minimum requirement for becoming a hospital CEO.  That is not as true today because of the shortage of FACHEs and the effects of some head-hunters focused on making their own jobs easier by convincing Boards of Directors that requiring professional certification will unnecessarily restrict the pool of candidates.  My question of a Board making a decision like this is why would they want to expand their net to catch applicants that did not feel that getting certification in their discipline was important?  Ironically in hospitals, these Boards preside over medical staffs that increasingly require Board Certification of their members.  My question is if they support requiring Board Certification of their physicians, why would they intentionally establish a lower threshold for the executives operating the organization?  If the demand was higher for certified leaders, it could result in an remuneration differential and lead to more executives seeking certification.  If I was advising a Board or a hiring executive, I would and have required headhunters to build a very strong case for recommending consideration of a non-certified executive when certified executives are available.

If you are an executive that is interested in career advancement, my advice is that credentialing is one of the first things you should consider.  The type of credentialing you pursue can vary depending upon your current or desired role.  In nursing for example,  a wide variety of credentials are available.  Many nurses carry several credentials.

We have all heard the adage that if something was simple or easy, everyone would have it. This principle certainly applies to credentialing.  Credentialing can be expensive, time consuming and difficult.  Credentials require a combination of minimum education, in-role experience, examinations, service under the tutelage of another certified leader and the like.  Each discipline has a process for determining the requirements for one of their members to be recognized as the best among them.  Some are more rigorous than others.  An argument can be made that the more onerous the process, the higher the value of the credential and the greater the degree to which a credentialed executive is set off from his peers.  In the case of HFMA, the credential is a Fellowship and it is earned by less than 10% of the members.  If you are a HFMA member, start paying attention to the certified status of your peers and look at their career advancement success compared to the 90%+ of uncertified members.  It should not surprise you to discover that the type of people that pursue professional certification are the same type of people that tend to advance their careers faster than others.  Is it the credential?  To a degree, I would argue that the answer is yes.

Please feel free to contact me to discuss any questions or observations you might have about these blogs or interim executive services in general.  As the only practicing Interim Executive that has done a dissertation on Interim Executive Services in healthcare in the US, I might have an idea or two that might be valuable to you.  I can also help with career transitions or career planning.
The easiest way to keep abreast of this blog is to become a follower.  You will be notified of all updates as they occur.  To become a follower, just click the “Following” link that usually appears as a bubble near the bottom this web page.
There is a comment section at the bottom of each blog page.  Please provide input and feedback that will help me to improve the quality of this work.
This is original work.  This material is copyrighted by me with reproduction prohibited without prior permission and attribution.  I note and  provide links to supporting documentation for non-original material.
If you would like to discuss any of this content or ask questions, I may be reached at ras2@me.com. I look forward to engaging in productive discussion with anyone that is a practicing interim executive or a decision maker with experience engaging interim executives in healthcare.

What is a blind reference?

Some people naively think that the only reference checking that is done is with the references given by a candidate or to a head hunter.   Executives recruiting for talent will peruse your CV looking for places where you and they might have common acquaintances.  They will also look for places that some of their friends and professional contacts might have insights.  When these links are found which is most of the time for an experienced recruiter or hiring executive, you are about to become the victim of a blind reference.

A ‘blind reference’ is an investigation into your past by a hiring executive that you know nothing about.

I do not put a lot of faith in  references provided by a candidate although I have had candidates give me references that were not very complimentary of them.  If you are going to give a reference, at least have an idea about what they are likely to say about you.  No one that has any sense is going to intentionally give a bad reference on a candidate to a stranger.  I also disregard reference letters.  No one is going to write a letter that states the candidate is bad.  On occasion, I will write a reference letter for someone as a personal favor but I aways counsel them that reference letters in my opinion are a total waste of time.  The only time I pay any attention to a reference letter is if I know the author.

Because of political correctness and the cold legal realities associated with references these days, the best you are going to get from formal references in most cases is that the candidate was hired on one date and departed on another date.  The most you are likely to learn is that the candidate actually did work for the firm you are contacting for the stated period of time.  They will rarely tell you anything more because references are subjective by nature in most cases.  Subjective references that cause a candidate to be ruled out of a search can become a liability for the person that gave the reference.  This is one of the reasons that blind reference checking has grown in my opinion.

If I get a reference call on a candidate being evaluated by someone I do not know, I refer the call to HR where I know what they are going to be told.  Even if the reference call comes from a friend,  I know the candidate and I know them to be bad, usually instead of giving a bad reference, I will usually refer my friend to HR where they will get the standard, canned response.  The hiring manager gets the message.  If a friend encounters me refusing to give a reference, they get the message.

The more frequent call that I get is from a decision maker that is checking references that are not on the candidate’s list.  These are the calls that are dangerous for candidates because they are blind to the candidate; hence a blind reference call.  The candidate will never know in most cases they were vetted through a blind source.  This is one of the many reasons why it is so important to keep up your networking and to not burn bridges unnecessarily.  If you left a place under questionable circumstances, you need to have a good explanatory story and you need to be forthcoming and transparent.  Of course a blind reference is not necessarily a bad thing.  Under the right conditions, it can propel you to the front of the line.  I received a blind reference call on a candidate I happened to be considering at the same time.  I told the blind reference caller that they could dispense with their questions because my reference will be very simple, “If you do not hire her, I will.”  I had worked with this candidate before and she is outstanding.  She was going to end up with a gig regardless of how the reference checking worked out in this case.

When I get a blind call from someone I know and trust, they are going to learn the whole story.  The reason is that I know I can call them to have the favor returned at some point in the future.  If the candidate departed under less than ideal circumstances or told a story that I know to not be true, I will give the reference to HR as stated above.  This usually surprises the decision maker that hoped to get something from me.  The fact that I refuse to provide a reference for someone that the decision maker knows I know well usually tells them enough, especially when I put off multiple requests for help.   About the third time I refuse to provide any information, the recruiting executive gets the message.  If you are going to engage in this activity, you have to be absolutely certain that your confidence will be protected.  This is the main reason that I resist giving references to head hunters unless I know them personally because it is hard to be certain your confidentiality will be protected.

When you are looking for a job, who will the hiring decision maker call?  What will they be told by people you used to work around?  Time after time, I have received blind reference calls.  Often, these calls are about someone that has done little if anything to endear themselves to me or to even keep in touch.  People like this generally do not return calls, ask of an acquaintance while offering nothing of value i.e., they do not engage in networking, they do not accept meetings or referrals, they do not attend or participate in industry related networking or continuing education activities such as ACHE or HFMA.  I wonder what these people expect I am going to say about them?  And of course, all of this is above and beyond anything I might know about their acumen, experience or capabilities.   I would rather not receive these calls in the first place but I do not control who calls me.

I do not know what it is about some people.  In one case, I reached out to an executive that I thought might benefit from my insight about handling executive turnover in his organization.  He humored me then never called me back in spite of the fact that I specifically requested a call regarding a wealth of information that I volunteered.  I never heard from him and I do not expect to hear from him because his failure to take my advice was at least partially responsible for his own firing a couple of months later.  A few weeks ago, I got a blind reference call.  The guy was seeking employment with a consulting firm and I knew the hiring executive very well.  What do you think happened?

This kind of thing does not have to happen to you.  If you are smart, you will get serious about networking and building as many positive relationships as you can.  Many of these relationships come from active participation in associations, alliances and industry peer groups.  You should volunteer your time to give yourself exposure to people that you might need for a job some day and in the process help them develop a positive impression of  you.

There is a saying that there are three kinds of people;  Those that make things happen, those that watch things happen and those that wonder what happened.  You never know when someone is going to make a call to someone that you might not even know; about you – a blind reference.  When that occurs, what will the results of that call be?  If you or someone you know is having difficulty getting a job and their qualifications appear competitive, they may be the victim of blind reference checking which puts them in the category of wondering what happened.

Please feel free to contact me to discuss any questions or observations you might have about these blogs or interim executive services in general.  As the only practicing Interim Executive that has done a dissertation on Interim Executive Services in healthcare in the US, I might have an idea or two that might be valuable to you.  I can also help with career transitions or career planning.

The easiest way to keep abreast of this blog is to become a follower.  You will be notified of all updates as they occur.  To become a follower, just click the “Following” link that usually appears as a bubble near the bottom this web page.

There is a comment section at the bottom of each blog page.  Please provide input and feedback that will help me to improve the quality of this work.

This is original work.  This material is copyrighted by me with reproduction prohibited without prior permission.  I note and  provide links to supporting documentation for non-original material.

If you would like to discuss any of this content or ask questions, I may be reached at ras2@me.com. I look forward to engaging in productive discussion with anyone that is a practicing interim executive or a decision maker with experience engaging interim executives in healthcare.

Just a nurse?

Merry Christmas.  This article is my Christmas gift to my readers, especially nurses whether they read my blog or not.  I thank you for your support and wish all of you the very best for this Christmas season and a safe and prosperous new year.

My wife sent me an article that ran in Fox news about an Australian nurse that fought back on Facebook after having her fill of hearing, “just a nurse.”

One of the saddest aspects of our society in my opinion is the general lack of regard that people have for hospitals.  It is especially demoralizing when community leaders are actively engaged in destroying their community hospital and in the process disrespecting the doctors, nurses, volunteers, leadership and hard-working employees who would do anything for them at any time, no questions asked.  It makes you wonder whether the people who engage in this destruction even care about the capability of the hospital should they or one of their loved ones be stricken with an accident or illness.  I tell audiences regularly that it is not hard to see that  people do not care about the hospital . . . . until they need it.  The same people who persecute voluntary trustees and administrative representatives of their community hospital  expect nothing but the best that medicine has to offer when they or one of their loved ones needs the hospital’s services.  Some of these hypocrites will quietly seek healthcare elsewhere while doing nothing constructive to help their community hosptial.  Sometimes I wonder if the people in the towns where these activities occur realistically believe that they can escape an involuntary visit to their community hospital when they are the victim of an accident, a heart attack or some other unanticipated serious illness?

When the people who engage in activities of this ilk intentionally denigrate their hospital, they are disrespecting all of the employees, physicians and volunteers of the hospital by inference regardless of what they say.  Just like the disgusting, duplicative politicians that commit the young people in the military to life endangering missions then withhold resources and/or engage in open criticism of the military.  This disingenuous behavior is too routine in our society when we witness the spectacle of politicians holding hands and praying together before they send the military overseas only to then undermine and denigrate military leadership and increase the number of body bags coming home by their subsequent lack of support.

I view a hospital like an aircraft carrier.  On a carrier, EVERY person aboard the ship has a job that can be directly traced to the support of a relatively small number of airplanes and their pilots.   The ratio is over 6,000 to about 100.  In a hospital, the primary  reason for every person in the organization is to support the nursing function, more specifically, bedside nurses.  The services delivered in hospitals are for the most part ordered by physicians but they are delivered by nurses.  It is the nurse that is in the building with the patient 24/7/365.  It is the nurse that will place themselves between a patient and any source of danger or threat.  It is the nurse that is the first responder to the patient’s every need.  It is the nurse that carries our their responsibilities with dignity and pride even when they are disparaged or abused by physicians and other authority figures in a hospital.  It is the nurse that is the voice of assurance when a patient is afraid.  It is the nurse that is left to pick up the pieces when a tragedy occurs.  It is the nurse that carries out the final preparations following death.

Nurses control resource utilization and therefore the cost of providing healthcare.  It would seem that executives that are interested in getting more out of nursing would see to it that nurses have what they need to do their job.  In my experience, most of the time, no one has to tell nurses what to do.  They know what to do and they will do it gladly if we will facilitate their efforts and get out of their way.   Those of us in healthcare administration should be ever vigilant to remove barriers, policies and procedures that frustrate the efforts of our nurses to give their patients our collective best.  Nurses influence patient satisfaction and patient outcomes.  One of the greatest sins in society in my opinion is activities of any kind in a hospital that undermine nursing, particularity when these activities are carried out by authority figures.

You do not have to teach or train a nurse to be compassionate or focused on error free work.  In fact nurses operate at far higher levels of performance than the rest of us usually appreciate.  Most of us would not make it very long if we had to perform at the level of our nurses.  Nurses understand the grave consequences of errors in their work.  All too frequently, a nurse that is involved in an all too common human error becomes the second victim of a bad outcome.  That these people can function at all under this stress tells the rest of us how incredible our nurses are.

I have thoroughly enjoyed my relationships with nurses over the years.  The type of people who gravitate to nursing are special.  Most of them are motivated to be in a position to do things to help other people in their time of need.  They do not allow those of us that are ‘bad patients’ to detract from their focus to give us their best.  Their attitude is always positive and uplifting even when we are in the mist of having our worst day(s) and showing it liberally.

Most hospitals recognize their nurses by providing badging that clearly indicates that they are nurses.  One of my personal crusades is to make sure that EVERY nurse in the organization whether they are a bedside nurse or not PROUDLY display their RN identification so that no one will mistake these giants of humanity for any one of the rest of us regardless of their role.

What would our world be without nurses?  What would our world be without the type of people that gravitate to nursing?  What are we doing as leaders that is making life more difficult for our nurses?  Are we creating environments more or less conducive to patient safety?

The next time an opportunity presents itself, do not miss taking the time to thank every nurse you meet for their service to the hospital, its patients and your community.

Please feel free to contact me to discuss any questions or observations you might have about these blogs or interim executive services in general.  As the only practicing Interim Executive that has done a dissertation on Interim Executive Services in healthcare in the US, I might have an idea or two that might be valuable to you.  I can also help with career transitions or career planning.

The easiest way to keep abreast of this blog is to become a follower.  You will be notified of all updates as they occur.  To become a follower, just click the “Following” link that usually appears as a bubble near the bottom this web page.

There is a comment section at the bottom of each blog page.  Please provide input and feedback that will help me to improve the quality of this work.

This is original work.  This material is copyrighted by me with reproduction prohibited without prior permission.  I note and  provide links to supporting documentation for non-original material.

If you would like to discuss any of this content or ask questions, I may be reached at ras2@me.com. I look forward to engaging in productive discussion with anyone that is a practicing interim executive or a decision maker with experience engaging interim executives in healthcare.

Where is Mark Richt?

A lot of people do not understand executive succession events.  It is common for a leader to be liked inside and outside the organization.  The performance of the leader is seen differently based upon the perspective of the viewer.  While many may see a leader as ‘nice’ and ‘trying hard’ others see him as ineffective.  In several of my articles, I make reference to the fact that as you progress in leadership, you are evaluated more on the results of what you do than the effort expended in leadership.  Some times, personal or organizational limitations inhibit the potential of a leader to be effective regardless of how hard he tries.  Ultimately, the people responsible for the leader conclude that in order for the organization to reach its perceived potential, a leadership change is necessary.  It is at this point that executive turnover begins and it is almost always followed by collateral turnover as lower level leaders are replaced in an effort to improve the ability of the organization to better meet its challenges or mission.

In Georgia, we have an excellent example of this phenomena.  When someone asks me what happened to someone or how the organization could do something so harsh to such a nice guy, I ask them, “Where is Mark Richt?”  In November of 2015, the University of Georgia announced that Mark Richt was leaving.  Many wonder why.  This gives me an opportunity to launch a Socratic dialog.  My questions usually go something like this:

Would anyone argue with the following premises?

That Mark Richt was not a nice guy?

That he compiled a record at Georgia and in the NCAA that places him among the icons of sport leadership?

That he did not understand the game of football?

That he did not want to win?

That he did not live an exemplary Christian life?

That he intervened in the lives of dozens if not hundreds of young people to set their lives on a better course?

And in spite of all of this, he is gone.  However painful the transition must have been for him, at least it was a homecoming of sorts as he has returned to his alma mater in Florida.

The reason for the transition is that the people responsible for Mark’s employment concluded that the program was not going to reach its expected potential under his leadership.  Those of us familiar with SEC football know that this means that nothing much matters in GA if you cannot beat Alabama and Florida consistently.

People are inclined to blame a lot of things for a situation like this.  Things like recruiting, the players, the coaches, facilities, funding, the play book, play calling and on and on.  Sometimes a coach like a business leader is handicapped by unexpected loss of talent due to behavioral issues like those pointed out in another of my articles, injuries, transfers or other losses.  The reason is irrelevant.  The leader of an organization or part of an organization is accountable for the results achieved or lack thereof and a responsibility that cannot be abdicated rests upon his shoulders.

Sometimes, leadership turnover induced in an organization makes things worse.  We will see as the season progresses if the Georgia team has achieved improvement.  As is the case in situations like this, it may take some time (several seasons) before the final analysis can be done.  As I have said before, if you are a leader, you have to lead; from the front.  You cannot wait for someone to tell you what to do.  In order to be effective, you must take initiative and frequently risk if you wish to keep yourself ‘off the radar.’  This is unless you have reached the limits of your capability and are falling victim to the Peter Principle.  If this is the case, you still have control of your destiny.  You must continue to invest in yourself though study, professional credentialing, post-graduate education or other means of continually re-inventing yourself and maintaining your relevance to a constantly changing and increasingly challenging environment.

The current healthcare environment is difficult to say the least.  As the industry transitions to value based payment, many of the rules and assumptions of the past are crumbling before our eyes.  Individuals and organizations that are capable of adapting and prospering in this rapidly changing environment will do well while many others will fall by the wayside.  Leadership is hard enough in a ‘stable’ environment if there is such a thing.  It is infinitely more difficult in an environment where the organization is striving to improve itself while it reacts to external environmental forces.

What is the outcome of your self assessment?  Are you up to the challenges?  Do you understand the nature of coming heightened demand to make your area better?  If so, are you up to the challenges and opportunities that are being presented?

One of my personal challenges is that I am ever cognizant of the difference between what I believe are my capabilities those of my team of leaders and what I believe the environment is demanding.  I will never be satisfied that we are accomplishing as much as our collective potential should deliver.  As a result, I spend a great deal of time in continuous study and research in an  effort to improve my ability to understand and properly respond to challenges, opportunities and risks that come my way every day.  I feel the burden of leaders reporting to me, the staff of the organization, the patients, the medical staff and the hope of the community that we will ‘get it right’ for them.  I find the exhilaration of this dynamic environment stimulating and I am up to the challenge.  My hope for you is that through these articles and your development of you own capability you will be inspired to emerge as one of the strongest leaders in your organization.

As the healthcare environment continues to become more challenging, organizations and their leadership teams are being shaken out.  This is what is causing a lot of the consolidation we are seeing in the healthcare industry.  Leaders, systems and processes that worked in the past are failing in this tougher environment.  Some of the problem is government induced problems that are difficult if not impossible for community hospitals to overcome.  An example is the cumulative effects of government healthcare policy on rural hospitals that are systematically being forced out of business.  In spite of these handicaps, some organizations do better in a given environment than others.  There is a dearth of leadership in healthcare just like there is in professional sports, business and other endeavors.  One of the causes of the inordinately high turnover in healthcare administration is a continuing effort on the part of hospital Boards and executive leadership to improve the caliber of talent and this effort is one of the reasons that good people are being turned out of organizations at an alarming rate.  One of the few benefits of this activity is that it is creating growing demand for Interim Executive Services.

Please feel free to contact me to discuss any questions or observations you might have about these blogs or interim executive services in general.  As the only practicing Interim Executive that has done a dissertation on Interim Executive Services in healthcare in the US, I might have an idea or two that might be valuable to you.  I can also help with career transitions or career planning.

The easiest way to keep abreast of this blog is to become a follower.  You will be notified of all updates as they occur.  To become a follower, just click the “Following” link that usually appears as a bubble near the bottom this web page.

This is original work.  This material is copyrighted by me with reproduction prohibited without prior permission.  I note and  provide links to supporting documentation for non-original material.

If you would like to discuss any of this content or ask questions, I may be reached at ras2@me.com. I look forward to engaging in productive discussion with anyone that is a practicing interim executive or a decision maker with experience engaging interim executives in healthcare.

So you want to become an interim executive?

I get requests about Interim Executive Services from people that are starting to look at interim consulting as a means to make a living and/or make a difference.

My first response to this question from someone is why?

What is their perception of interim executive services?  What about it do they find attractive?  What is their level of understanding of what is involved?

Collectively, these questions address the level of sophistication of an interim executive as described by Goss and Bridson.

Unless the person is legitimately interested in becoming a sophisticated interim executive, I am done talking with them.

The reason is that an unsophisticated interim has the potential to cause more problems than they solve and they will be conflicted in the organization(s) they serve.  I believe an organization that is interested in securing interim assistance deserves a sophisticated interim even if they do not know any better themselves.  If the interim is not serious about their role as an interim and what they are really looking for is a job or to disrupt a search, I have no further interest in wasting time on them.

So what is being an interim about anyway?  First the bad part.

You will be working long (12 + hour days) while living in a hotel in a strange town.  It can get very lonely. You will be working in a stressed or  distressed organization that is unstable because of prior and coming managerial transitions.  A lot of people in the organization will resent your presence.  This resentment has several sources.  Frequently, there is remorse for the departed executive.  It is common for people to feel like their previous leader did not deserve to be terminated or that they got a bad deal.  These concerns are generally valid.  I rarely follow ‘bad’ executives.  I follow people that are no longer in the organization due to politics, the performance of their area of responsibility or the fact that they became collateral damage to other potentially unrelated turnover.  Sometimes people I follow have left the organization because the executive lost credibility.  In other cases, it was determined that either the organization or their area of responsibility is not meeting its mission and that things were unlikely to improve.  I discuss this phenomena in an earlier blog.  Sometimes a need is created when a successful executive takes advantage of a career opportunity and decides on their own to move on.  Another reason for resentment is that in addition to employees seeing you ‘taking’ their prior leader’s job, they sometimes see you getting paid what they believe to be premium pay for providing your services.

In addition to the resentment, there is a trust issue.  People are naturally cautious about trusting someone they do not know.  In  a transition, there is plenty of paranoia about what you have been told, your goals and how people around you might be affected by your role in the organization.  They know you are very closely connected to the Board and/or the front office and they fear your knowledge about the future direction of the role you are filling or the organization.

The lifestyle that goes along with interim executive services can be brutal.  Your life devolves into a two dimensional existence that consists only of work and sleep.  You lose touch with friends and activities back home until eventually they are no longer a part of your life.  Having a ‘routine’ disappears as you lose the ability to maintain exercise, a social life and healthy eating activities. After a usual schedule of four ten to twelve hour days, you get to go through the only remaining legal form of torture; air travel – twice per week.  The expense, the hassle, the strip searches, the time and frustration of travel further eats into your time until you have little if any personal time left.  Hobbies and extracurricular activities become memories.  Living in a hotel and eating out every day becomes an old drag quickly.  Anyone that has done this knows how fast the ‘glamor’ of being a consultant wears off.  It even takes a lot of time to begin to figure your way around  the town.

You are in the organization but you are not really part of it.  You do not share any of the culture and history and there is usually no expectation that you will be around long enough to develop meaningful relationships.  Remember the ‘Replacements’ segment from the TV series, ‘A Band of Brothers?’  If not, you should look it up.  You are rarely included in social activities in or out of the organization. As a result, you feel isolated and alone.  Initially, no one expects you to be around very long so they make no effort to get to know you.  The distance that others in the organization establish, particularly other executives is palpable.

Under good conditions, you are drinking daily from a firehose, particularly in the earlier stages of an engagement.  You do not know anyone, you do not know where anything is, you do not know who controls what and as you proceed through your engagement, it is common to identify issues that need attention at a rate that far exceeds your ability to address them.  People are cordial either because it is the right thing to do or they feel it helps their personal cause without going out of their way to be particularly helpful most of the time.

I could go on and on about this but hopefully you are beginning to get the point about the challenges of being relatively unwelcome in a strange organization in a strange town where the organization is being roiled by the effects of what is usually an unexpected turnover event or multiple turnover events.  I served an organization that had released nine senior executives at the same time including the CEO and most of his direct reports.  The managers left were shell shocked and some of them had survivor’s remorse.  They could not function because they could not understand why they were left and some of their best friends and associates were gone.  Most of these people eventually left the organization.

Given all of this, the obvious question is why on earth would anyone that had not lost their mind would want to have anything to do with this kind of work?

I believe there are two primary answers.  The first is that there will never be a better opportunity in that organization for an interim executive executive to have a transformational impact that can literally alter the course of the organization.  The second reason is that the work has the potential to be exhilarating from the intellectual challenges it presents while being more lucrative financially than traditional employment.

A turnover event starts when the organization or its Board concludes that the organization of a part of it is on the wrong track and the existing leader is not meeting the organization’s needs.  When the body of evidence that the situation is unlikely to improve reaches critical mass, the turnover and succession processes start.  An interim coming into a situation like this finds that unlike an employment situation where you have to fight politics, bureaucracy and undermining peers to get anything done, the organization is hungry for fresh ideas, new blood and the injection of energy into an area that was perceived to be falling behind.  It is common to enjoy considerably more latitude than your predecessor to make what would have previously been considered radical recommendations to get the organization moving in the right direction.  Leadership and governance are actually interested in what you have to say and are considerably more likely to act on reasoned recommendations.  Of course, the burden of responsibility that comes with being such an advisor is sobering because you are expected to ‘get it right’ 100% of the time.  This is not an easy burden to bear.

Another reason for performing interim executive services is what I call empowerment.  Employees at every level sub-optimize routinely because they engage in self preservation.  They guard their jobs and roles at any cost.  When you have nothing to lose by being fired and you have absolutely no fear of being fired, you enjoy a sense of liberation and empowerment that can only be appreciated by experiencing the phenomena.  Because you have no ‘job’ to protect, you can say and do things no employee would ever consider.  You can challenge the organization, its leadership and governance to do hard things if they are the right course of action for the organization even if making the recommendations puts your own role at risk.  The only objective I have as an interim executive is to get the best result possible for the organization regardless of how I am affected.  If I get run out of town for that, I will leave happy with knowledge that whether they agreed or not, they will at least be making informed decisions.  I recently told a community leader that my biggest concern if I got run out of town would be whether or not I could stay out of work long enough to have a decent vacation. There is no shortage of organizations needing competent, professional Interim Executive leadership services.  So far, I have not been run out of a town and I have said and done things in Board rooms that have resulted in shock, awe and horror.  I have pressed organizational leaders and Board members to do the hard work necessary to make their organization better.

The upside of this is that I have left every organization I have served a better place and I have continuing excellent relationships with Board members and CEOs of every organization I have served.  This is another of the many benefits of interim services; the residual impact of your transformational leadership in an organization will last for years after you are gone.  The courage and determination you demonstrated in your efforts to achieve better results for the organization will inspire many that follow you.  This probably will come across as cliche’ but the US is a great county.  My wife and I have been blessed to serve healthcare organizations in many states.  Every part of the country has a unique culture and climate.  It is interesting to learn how certain concentrations of ethnic groups came to be located as they are around the country.  You cannot learn nearly as much about an area passing through  as you can by living in the community for several months  at a time.  These aspects of Interim Executive services can be extremely rewarding.  Decision makers in distressed organizations are generally anxious to get help.  I frequently encounter staff that have been frustrated by the fact that they were let down by their leadership and as soon as you establish credibility, they engage you in as much Mentorship as they can absorb.

In the past year, I have received two of the most rewarding telephone calls of my life.  One came from the Chairman of the Finance Committee of a hospital system that had just been upgraded by a rating agency.  The first call he made was to me to thank me for my intervention years earlier.  In his opinion, the results of my run in that organization laid the groundwork for the improvement in performance that led to a rating upgrade years later.  The second call was with a CEO who told me that the people in the community served by his hospital owed me a debt of gratitude for my service in spite of the fact that there were only a very few members of the community that had any knowledge that I had ever been there.

You might say, all of this sounds good but what about the people that came before?  I make it a habit to resist criticism of my predecessor(s) or the decisions they made.  In fact, I told one Board that as far as I could tell, the guy they got rid of was better technically than me.  As I said before, in nearly every case, they are good people and I do not know why they did what they did.  I was not there at the time previous decisions were made and I am not privy to the information they had or the pressures they were under when they made the decisions that sent them on a path toward transition.  I do know from personal experience how brutally agonizing it is to go through a transition, especially if it is the first transition for that departing leader.

The most common primary concern of departing leaders have expressed to me is that their successor will ‘trash’ them.  I have had this happen to me and I know how it feels, especially when the criticism is coming from someone that does not know me.  As a result, I have made it my habit to reach out to my predecessor and offer any assistance that I could during and following their transition.  These people are not happy and initially some of them have not been particularly happy about dealing with their involuntary successor.  I am very proud to say that in most every case, each of these executives have gone on to much bigger and better things and I maintain friendly, cordial realationships with them.

I have been instrumental in replacing myself in several organizations including casting the deciding vote.  I am happy to say that in each of these situations, my successor is still in place and the organizations are better for my Interim Executive intervention.  I was blessed and honored to have the opportunity to serve in a variety of cultures, climates and communities.

So if you are looking at a career move, you can handle the lifestyle and you wish to make a difference while earning above average income, you might be suited for Interim Executive Services.  Obviously, this work is not well suited for people trying to raise families.  I will conclude by stating that if you are married,  the unqualified support of your spouse is a necessity for success as an Interim Executive.  I will write an article in the future on how to qualify yourself for one of these roles.

Please feel free to contact me to discuss any questions or observations you might have about these blogs or interim executive services in general.  As the only practicing Interim Executive that has done a dissertation on Interim Executive Services in healthcare in the US, I might have an idea or two that might be valuable to you.  I can also help with career transitions or career planning.

The easiest way to keep abreast of this blog is to become a follower.  You will be notified of all updates as they occur.  To become a follower, just click the “Following” link in the menu bar at the top of this web page.

This is original work.  This material is copyrighted by me with reproduction prohibited without prior permission.  I note and  provide links to supporting documentation for non-original material.

If you would like to discuss any of this content or ask questions, I may be reached at ras2@me.com. I look forward to engaging in productive discussion with anyone that is a practicing interim executive or a decision maker with experience engaging interim executives in healthcare.

There is nothing that I can do for you.

 

Responding to my blog article entitled, “Why do CEO’s get fired . . . ” Bill Eikost, a long time aquaintance of mine in a comment raised the following question:

“In one facility, the hospital had contracted with a large consulting practice to come in and do an assessment of the organization.  As I understand it, when they made their presentation, which included some tough decisions be made, the board objected to it not being in the best interest of the organization or the community.  Why have them come in in the first place then?  The CEO supported the idea of the change but was met with resistance from his board. In almost all cases, I would bet the board wins.  As a result, many of the senior leadership left and they brought in or promoted new leadership to continue the course. ”

I have been mocked for having epiphanies.  People tell me they are tired of hearing some of the stories I use to make a point or illustrate a concept.

Recently, I have been dealing with some vexing problems related to matters beyond my control and entrenched, recalcitrant culture.  It was during a personal low point of frustration, depression and demoralization about these matters that I had yet another of my epiphanies.

Heart surgeons regularly carry out miraculous interventions that result in people that would otherwise be dead walking from the hospital under their own power healing of their afflictions.  One of the more difficult aspects of being a cardiovascular surgeon is case selection.  CV surgeons and their practices are continuously evaluated by all sorts of local and national statistics.  One of these statistics is mortality.  What percentage of patients treated by this physician ended up dying?  Talk about a Hobson’s choice!  On one hand, the physician is motivated to do everything within his power to give the patient the best possible chance of survival.  On the other hand, there are times when the probability of a surgical intervention being successful is nominal.  A surgeon that is too aggressive taking high risk cases will have an above average mortality rate and be branded a bad doctor.  Can you imagine what it must be like to look another human being in the eye and tell them, “There is nothing I can do for you.”  The surgeon knows that putting the patient through a procedure would be unlikely to be successful but he also knows that he is in many cases effectively issuing that patient a death sentence.  I could not do this and I have respect for these surgeons that I cannot articulate.  I do not think I could do this and live with myself.  The next time you see one of them, thank them for their service.

Getting back to my epiphany, some of the things needed to ease the stress on the organization were going to require some community leaders and Board members to step up to challenges and take on controversy they did not sign up for.  Sometimes the easiest thing to do is nothing and if this were to occur, I was finished.  I had reached the point where if this was to be the case, there was nothing more I could do for my organization (patient).  In the middle of the night I awoke in a cold sweat when this realization dawned upon me.  Suddenly, I had insight into what it must feel like for a surgeon to tell a patient they cannot be helped.  If the resolve in the organization and the Board to take on the hard work was not there, I was done.  It would make no sense to continue to play along burning up time and resources on a hopeless cause.

All of us have heard the admonition, “Do not go to the doctor unless you intend to do what he tells you to do.”  Compliance in medicine is a huge problem.  If I was at this point, I could easily log some more time but effectively it was over.

I have seen this phenomena before but I did not see it in this light.  I have seen several organizations go through this process.  In one case, an organization that had never had what I would describe as a professional materials manager expressed resolve to recruit one.  An outstanding incumbent was recruited following a long, arduous retained search.  And of course, less than six months into his run as he would say, “the defecation hit the rotary oscillator.”  Seemingly over night, the organization that said it wanted a materials manager changed its mind when the realization of what actually having a materials manager really meant starting dawning.  Sadly, the new executive’s tenure ended up being very short, his career and his family were disrupted and the organization went back to doing things as they had before.  This was the first but certainly not the only time I have seen this happen.

Time for another digression.  About the materials manager referenced above.  His case is fairly typical.  Sometimes the fit is not right but that does not mean the person is bad.  While no one would recommend anyone going though a situation like the one described, the manager emerged from this trauma a better person for the experience, stronger, wiser and with a clearer vision about evaluating opportunities.  He has gone on to have a distinguished career and currently holds one of the largest material management jobs in the entire healthcare industry and thank heavens, the two of us are still on speaking terms.

A lot of people say they want a lot of things until they fully realize what is involved or what the ‘desired’ change implies.  For example, I described what it takes to obtain an advanced role in an organization in a previous blog article.  A lot of people say they want the lifestyle and income that comes with higher level jobs until they find out how long and hard the road is to get there.  Unfortunately, I do not know of any way to assess in advance the point at which resistance will be encountered or how it will be addressed.

In my recent personal case, I have seen support I would not have believed possible come to bear in an effort to achieve the favorable change for the hospital and the community that is there for the taking.  You never know what people are going to do until the chips are down and the hard questions are on the table.

Kevin Rutherford, a trucker, radio commentator, author and producer of a trucking website ends his shows with the admonition to, “Do the hard work and master the journey.”  I like to say that you will never find the walls unless you are willing to push the limits.

Success is not measured by how long you last in an organization.  It is not measured by how  good you are at ‘staying off the radar’ when the organization is seeking to improve itself.  It is not measured in how adept you are at keeping your job.  Success in my opinion is defined by the degree to which you demonstrate selfless leadership to take your area of responsibility to the next level.  I have posed the pertinent questions before.  Are you and your area an example of the best of their type in the industry?  Are you an example of what others should aspire to become?  Are you and your area an example of best practice?  Is your expertise sought out by peers striving to improve themselves?  Do you know what data is used to make these determinations?  Do you compare favorably with all of the statistics available to evaluate your leadership?  Are you taking initiative or are you waiting for someone to come along and tell you what to do?

An honest self-assessment is very difficult but in my experience, no one that was ‘left behind’ should not have seen it coming.

Please feel free to contact me to discuss any questions or observations you might have about these blogs or interim executive services in general.  As the only practicing Interim Executive that has done a dissertation on Interim Executive Services in healthcare in the US, I might have an idea or two that might be valuable to you.  I can also help with career transitions or career planning.
The easiest way to keep abreast of this blog is to become a follower.  You will be notified of all updates as they occur.  To become a follower, just click the “Following” link in the menu bar at the top of this web page.
This is original work.  This material is copyrighted by me with reproduction prohibited without prior permission.  I note and  provide links to supporting documentation for non-original material.

If you would like to discuss any of this content or ask questions, I may be reached at ras2@me.com. I look forward to engaging in productive discussion with anyone that is a practicing interim executive or a decision maker with experience engaging interim executives in healthcare.

 

 

How do I get ahead?

A frequent question I get is how do I advance my career?  How do I get ahead in the organization?  This is a question I asked myself a lot earlier in my career.

The first question to ask is what does it mean to you to ‘get ahead?’  Success is not always best measured by career accomplishment.  I have learned that life is full of trade-offs.  If you wish to advance your professional career, you are going to have to pay a price.  The price is measured in short-term sacrifice for longer term goals, moving to where the opportunities are, pursuing advanced education and professional credentialing among others.  These ‘prices’ are higher than many people are willing or able to pay.  The effect is that they get trapped in roles where they can not realize or achieve their full potential.

When I was coming along, I was always looking up and ahead.  I was the first in my family to earn a college degree.  My parents did not understand college but they did recognize that people with college educations did better.  In college I was exposed to people that had achieved much personal and professional success.  I was inspired to replicate what these people had done so that I could enjoy the niceties of life that they had earned.  When I started working, it seemed to me that given the chance, I  could do better than the people ahead of me in the organization.  I set myself to learning what they had done to become qualified for their roles and I started closing the gaps of experience, expertise, knowledge and credentialing.  Before long, I was given consideration and started achieving my goals of reaching advanced roles in healthcare administration.

One of the things that occurred to me along this road is that the key thing organizations select and reward leaders for is cognitive skills.  Decision making in my opinion is one of the most if not the most valuable skills a leader can develop.  The better you are equipped to make decisions, the more responsibility the organization will bestow upon you.  The larger the responsibility, the more substantial the risks and rewards associated with the decisions you are called upon to make.  These risks and rewards are ultimately reflected in the remuneration for which you are eligible.

In my practice as an Interim Executive, I learned that the primary factor differentiating organizations that were doing well from those that ended up with challenges and transitions is less than optimal decision making.  Show me an organization with challenges, operational difficulties and unacceptable financial results and I will show you leadership that has compiled a poor record as a result of questionable decision making.

As I have reflected upon this phenomenon, it has occurred to me that as we progress through our career and through increasingly responsible roles, the nature of our work changes.  This has led to the development of my ‘Model of Career Progression.’

Slide11.jpg

Early on in our career, the amount of ‘work’ we do is how we are measured.  The work is usually measured in volume and it frequently requires a high level of technical skill but not much cognitive skill.  For example, what field on what page do I access to find certain information?  How many ‘activities’ can I complete in one day?  I once had a senior leader ask me if I had reviewed certain accounting journal entries.  I told him that I did not know what drawer the journal entries were stored in.  I did not know where the journal entry pad was and I could not remember whether the debits went by the door or the window.  What an outrageously stupid question!  I have not reviewed journal entries since I was a Controller over thirty years ago.  I am not paid to review journal entries, I am paid to assure that the organization’s financial statements are timely, materially accurate and that they fairly state the financial position and operating results of the organization.  Can you see the difference?

As you advance in an organization, technical skill becomes less important and decision making skill becomes much more important.  At higher levels of responsibility, you become more of a generalist because you are not evaluated based on how much ‘work’ you do.  You are evaluated based on the results of your leadership, particularly as it relates to the outcomes of your decision making regardless of how much time and effort you expend in the process.

In my opinion, the development of cognitive ability is what will launch or limit your ability to advance in an organization.  How do you develop cognitive ability?  All of us are limited at some level by our basic intellect but I do not think that is what constrains most people.  The reason is that people like Earl Nightingale and others have said that most of us rarely use more than 10% of our mental capacity so I am not buying the theory that people are not ‘smart enough’ to do higher level cognitive work.  The way you develop your skills is to invest in yourself by seeking advanced education and professional credentialing in your area of expertise or interest.  Continuous self study helps you to cement your position when given opportunities to function at higher levels.  Experience in multiple situations is also helpful.  You do not necessarily have to leave the organization to gain this experience.  I have counseled numerous young people to seek opportunities in other ares of the organization to learn as much as they can about how the enterprise functions and to see where their areas of greatest interest or gifts lie.

There has never been a time in healthcare that more and better leadership is desparately needed.  There are plenty of opportunities available for those who wish to advance their careers.  All you have to do if you are one of these people is to start investing in yourself.  I can assure you from my own personal experience that investment in yourself is the best investment you will ever make.  I don’t care how cliche the phrase is.  It has served me and a number of other very successful people I know extremely well.

Please feel free to contact me to discuss any questions or observations you might have about these blogs or interim executive services in general.  As the only practicing Interim Executive that has done a dissertation on Interim Executive Services in healthcare in the US, I might have an idea or two that might be valuable to you.  I can also help with career transitions or career planning.
The easiest way to keep abreast of this blog is to become a follower.  You will be notified of all updates as they occur.  To become a follower, just click the “Following” link in the menu bar at the top of this web page.
This is original work.  This material is copyrighted by me with reproduction prohibited without prior permission.  I note and  provide links to supporting documentation for non-original material.

If you would like to discuss any of this content or ask questions, I may be reached at ras2@me.com. I look forward to engaging in productive discussion with anyone that is a practicing interim executive or a decision maker with experience engaging interim executives in healthcare.

 

CFO Radio Interview

On October 17, 2011,  I was interviewed by Lorraine Chilvers on CFO Radio on the topic of Interim Executive Services.  The interview that lasted around 45 minutes is proceeded by some industry news.  During the course of the interview, I am asked about a variety of aspects of Interim Executive Services.  Since Lorraine has insight into the Interim Executive Consulting business, her questions were deeply probing and she did a very good job of engaging me on many of the more important aspects of Interim Engagements and the Interim Executive lifestyle.

Lorraine and I previously served together at Tatum.  Eventually, we went our separate ways.  I went on with my Interim Executive Services career and Lorraine went on to found Delaney Consulting and CFO Radio.

At the time of the interview, I was serving as the Interim Chief Financial Officer of The Central Florida Health Alliance serving Leesburg and The Villages in central Florida.  I recently listened to the interview again and it struck me that the material in the interview is just as current now as it was then.

The interview may be found here.